<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RxMike &#187; Legislative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rxmike.com/category/legislative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rxmike.com</link>
	<description>Connect...Learn...Grow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:43:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa Reconsiders Tech Certification Requirements</title>
		<link>http://rxmike.com/2009/02/iowa-reconsiders-tech-certification-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://rxmike.com/2009/02/iowa-reconsiders-tech-certification-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RxMike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy Technician]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rxmike.com/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks as if the chains are trying to make a loophole in Iowa pharmacy technician regulations. - &#8211; - - As the deadline looms for pharmacy technicians to obtain certification, the Iowa Board of Pharmacy is attempting to clearly define workers who are pharmacy technicians and those classified as pharmacy support persons. The law requiring [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks as if the <a href="http://www.nrf.com/">chains </a>are trying to make a loophole in Iowa pharmacy technician regulations.<br />
- &#8211; - -<br />
As the deadline looms for pharmacy technicians to obtain certification, the Iowa Board of Pharmacy is attempting to clearly define workers who are pharmacy technicians and those classified as pharmacy support persons.</p>
<p>The law requiring pharmacy technicians to be certified, passed in 2006, was backed by the Iowa Board of Pharmacy and requires pharmacy technicians to be certified before working in any Iowa pharmacy. Currently, registered pharmacy technicians must be certified no later than July 1, 2010. The controversy began after the adoption of the rules established after the bill’s passage, said Terry Witkowski, executive officer with the Iowa Board of Pharmacy.</p>
<p>Now a separate piece of legislation, House Study Bill 51 is expected to redefine who must be certified as a pharmacy technician. “There has been a request that the [Iowa pharmacy] board move to recognize individuals who are not involved in the more complex practices relating to pharmacy technicians,” Witkowski said. “People who may be working at a pharmacy and assisting a pharmacist, but not really directly handling the drugs, would be defined as a pharmacy support person.”</p>
<p>The new legislation would still require pharmacy support staff to be certified, but there would be no establishment of competency and no minimum age requirement as there are for pharmacy technicians.<br />
(<a href="http://www.modernmedicine.com/modernmedicine/Associations/New-Iowa-legislation-to-clarify-technician-registr/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/579461?contextCategoryId=40159">Drug Topics</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rxmike.com/2009/02/iowa-reconsiders-tech-certification-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Certification News</title>
		<link>http://rxmike.com/2009/01/certification-news/</link>
		<comments>http://rxmike.com/2009/01/certification-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RxMike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy Technician]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rxmike.com/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PTCB has announced that beginning April 1, 2009, the PTCB Examination will be available in continuous testing format at Pearson Professional Centers nationwide. PTCB also announced that exam candidates will receive an official pass or fail result at the test center after the completion of the exam, effective immediately. ICPT&#8217;s ExCPT certification exam has been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.ptcb.org">PTCB </a></strong>has announced that beginning April 1, 2009, the PTCB Examination will be available in continuous testing format at Pearson Professional Centers nationwide. PTCB also announced that exam candidates will receive an official pass or fail result at the test center after the completion of the exam, effective immediately.</p>
<p>ICPT&#8217;s <strong><a href="http://nationaltechexam.org">ExCPT </a></strong>certification exam has been added to the list of recognized certification exams for pharmacy technicians in the state of Nevada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rxmike.com/2009/01/certification-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
